Search Archives
Why New Daedalus?

Daedalus was the mythical great architect and artificer of the classical world. Today, embedded intelligence is enabling the most profound changes in the way we create and use buildings since his day.

Building Intelligence meets the Intelligent Building. The Intelligent Building negotiates with the Intelligent Grid. How will this transform how we interact with the physical world?

More on the Web
Powered by Squarespace
« Smoke Signals from the Energy Architecture workshop | Pervasive Security and Control Systems »

The Smart Grid is Not Faster RTUs

There is a growing awareness of cybersecurity for SCADA systems, one that has not, as of yet, brought anything like real security to SCADA in the power grid. SCADA (System Control And Data Acquisition) refers to the processes used for central control and operation of our biggest process systems. Process systems in this case include the distribution systems used for the electric grid and for water distribution systems: large not-very intelligent systems. I say not very intelligent because the often use a model in which each node is dumb as a thumb tack, and nearly as secure.

New business processes are demanding entrance. The utilities need DR (Demand-Response) to deal with their most pressing needs, but do not wish (for the most part) to share live metering data (“we think you should be happy with 15 minute intervals.”). We have a system architected so badly that “RTU interoperability” is considered some sort of holy grail. Perhaps this would be legitimate if RTU communications were some sort of high-performance wonder, but they are not.

New business models will break the old design philosophies. Distributed generation will mean that the substation operations you are monitoring will be controlled by someone else. Perhaps that someone else will include everyone with a zero net energy building. Perhaps that substation will be run by the Green HOA (Home Owners Association) set up by the large commodity builder complete with its own neighborhood generation.

This means you will have to assume that the substation is owned by someone else. This means that if you do have “one RTU incompatibility might take down the system” problems, then your system will be down. Failure to acknowledge this is just whistling past the graveyard.

The current power engineers run hierarchical end-to-end control systems than anyone. The question is, will this be like being one of the folks who understands SNA best, claiming to the end that only structured hierarchical controls can keep things afloat, while folks like NERC acknowledge greater instability every week.

Things will change. That change will involve embracing multi-party communications at the substation and at the end node. Thos multi-party communications will require something better than sealed end-to-end channels.

This is the way the tides are going. The choice is to promote the desirability of holding back the tide, or to acknowledge the rising damp.

Federated security. Multi-party communications. New market models.

Embrace them or become obsolete. The smart grid is more than just upping the speed of communications with your RTU.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>