<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:43:03 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>The New Daedalus</title><subtitle>The New Daedalus</subtitle><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/atom.xml"/><updated>2009-06-28T20:42:50Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Virginia Tech, Emergency Communications, and Academic Sheep</title><category term="Emergency Management"/><category term="Standards"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/28/virginia-tech-emergency-communications-and-academic-sheep.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/28/virginia-tech-emergency-communications-and-academic-sheep.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-28T20:40:56Z</published><updated>2009-06-28T20:40:56Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[When the Virginia Tech shootings hit the news two years ago, I was sitting in on 
a meeting of the committee developing standards for communication in 
emergencies. Interoperability is critical to innovation, and emergency scenarios 
make the innovation scenarios crystal clear. Unfortunately, emergencies also 
cause the timid to stampede, and there is no more timid class in America than 
the academic leadership at our colleges and universities. I began thinking of 
this entry during the anniversary recognitions on the UNC campus.</p>
<p>
Every school in the country rushed to do something, anything in the aftermath. 
Campus police chiefs were instructed to make a decision now, without waiting to ...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Cybersecurity for smart buildings and the smart grid</title><category term="Intelligent Buildings"/><category term="Security"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><category term="System Architecture"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/23/cybersecurity-for-smart-buildings-and-the-smart-grid.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/23/cybersecurity-for-smart-buildings-and-the-smart-grid.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-23T13:51:50Z</published><updated>2009-06-23T13:51:50Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
Building systems have until now been secured only for interaction between their 
parts. Schemes such as shared tokens used on open networks serve the purpose of 
isolating systems from interaction. They do not address the more intriguing 
security issues of interaction with non-system actors. These non-system actors 
may be agents from other systems, business process from other companies, or even 
direct consumer access.</p>
<p>
Today’s shared token security schemes are only thinly deployed...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Collaborative Energy—the Smart Grid and the End Node</title><category term="Energy"/><category term="Enterprise Interaction"/><category term="Intelligent Buildings"/><category term="Markets and Innovation"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><category term="Zero Energy Buildings"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/17/collaborative-energythe-smart-grid-and-the-end-node.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/17/collaborative-energythe-smart-grid-and-the-end-node.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-18T01:12:16Z</published><updated>2009-06-18T01:12:16Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
A significant goal of the smart grid is to encourage rapid innovation in the end
nodes, that is in the commercial buildings, homes, and industrial sites that
consume most of the electricity produced. Today’s North American power grid is
probably the supreme engineering feat of the twentieth century; it has made
possible the greatest life style ever lived. Its reliability, though, is
insufficient for the digital world. Every system margin has been pushed too
thin. The introduction of any significant portion of intermittent source energy,
such as wind and solar, will make things much worse.
</p>
<p>
It is time to engage the end nodes in supporting system reliability. Today’s
buildings have higher requirements for reliability and quality than the grid was
ever designed for. Site-based generation and site based storage are part of the
solution, but they could make the system even less reliable. It is time to begin
the move to collaborative energy...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Do we really need "IP Everywhere" in the smart grid?</title><category term="Background"/><category term="Energy"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><category term="Standards"/><category term="System Architecture"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/15/do-we-really-need-ip-everywhere-in-the-smart-grid.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/15/do-we-really-need-ip-everywhere-in-the-smart-grid.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-15T11:00:14Z</published><updated>2009-06-15T11:00:14Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[If you want to start a fight in a crowd of smart grid participants, you can begin one by announcing unambiguously how you feel about IP (Internet Protocol) everywhere. Vendors fight to gain advantage for or to forefend elimination of their product lines. Utilities become passionate to defend their AMI projects and their rate bases.

Many of these conversations are premised on (to my mind) flawed thinking. Others need to define what they really want rather than relying on a simple slogan...]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Schedules for Things and Markets</title><category term="Smart Grid"/><category term="Standards"/><category term="oBIX"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/6/schedules-for-things-and-markets.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/6/schedules-for-things-and-markets.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-06T16:32:24Z</published><updated>2009-06-06T16:32:24Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
Yesterday, I sat in on the final day of the Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium's semiannual conference (www.CalConnect.org). CalConnect 
is a consortium that promotes interoperability between dissimilar calendaring 
and scheduling systems. I was there to scout out their just unveiled xml 
serialization of ICalendar. I think we will use it a lot in buildings and on the 
smart grid.</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Intelligent Buildings talk to Smart Energy</title><category term="Intelligent Buildings"/><category term="Microgrids and Distributed Systems"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/4/intelligent-buildings-talk-to-smart-energy.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/6/4/intelligent-buildings-talk-to-smart-energy.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-06-04T00:51:32Z</published><updated>2009-06-04T00:51:32Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
Intelligent buildings filled with clever devices and intelligent systems will 
negotiate with the grid and with their occupants to provide new models for 
reliable power. The benefits to the grid will come from coordinating supply and 
demand using economic signals. The benefits to the buildings will be increased 
value by providing higher levels of amenities to their tenants and inhabitants 
for lower cost. The benefits to the tenants and occupants will be better 
services at the same or lower costs and more autonomy as they separate from grid 
dependency. The benefit to the clever devices will be longer life and more 
reliable operations from eliminating the power shocks that assail them now.</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Smart Cars At Loose on the Smart Grid</title><category term="Electric Cars"/><category term="Energy"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/26/smart-cars-at-loose-on-the-smart-grid.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/26/smart-cars-at-loose-on-the-smart-grid.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-05-26T02:10:34Z</published><updated>2009-05-26T02:10:34Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I have written before of the challenges of software for electric cars at home (Smart Cars at Home on the Grid). Today I want to expand the domain of those cars into the wider world. The minimal car software will have some way to make electronic purchases as it drives across the town and the country. The better car software will do much more.</p>
<p>
The electric car may recharge while on the road. It can also re-sell power when on the road. How it decides...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Smart Cars at Home on the Smart Grid</title><category term="Electric Cars"/><category term="GridWise"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/20/smart-cars-at-home-on-the-smart-grid.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/20/smart-cars-at-home-on-the-smart-grid.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-05-20T02:38:59Z</published><updated>2009-05-20T02:38:59Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
Too many of the scenarios for electric cars on the smart grid talk only about 
the relationship between the single car in the home and the grid. These 
relationships are not the most important ones, and will not determine the 
successful integration of millions of electric vehicles into the grid. The 
relationships that matter are those between the cars and their drivers, their 
family plans, and the other cars in the household. Car software will be even 
more important than car performance...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Transactive Energy and Little White Lies</title><category term="Energy"/><category term="Musings"/><category term="Smart Grid"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/18/transactive-energy-and-little-white-lies.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/18/transactive-energy-and-little-white-lies.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-05-18T02:05:50Z</published><updated>2009-05-18T02:05:50Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
As I head off to the second smart grid interim roadmap workshop (whew – that’s a 
lot of pairs) I think back to one of the participants in the Business and Policy 
track that I led with Lynne Kiesling. Several members, bunched together in the 
participants, were from the Edison Electric Institute, the association of share 
holder owned utilities. They peppered us with detailed questions and countered 
transactive smart grid scenarios with valid objections. It was on the second 
day, however, that I recognized the thought behind many of their concerns. They 
feel that they are asked to subsidize pretend transactions...</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>New Energy and Legacy Buildings</title><category term="Energy"/><category term="Intelligent Buildings"/><category term="Markets and Innovation"/><id>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/13/new-energy-and-legacy-buildings.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2009/5/13/new-energy-and-legacy-buildings.html"/><author><name>Toby Considine</name></author><published>2009-05-13T09:41:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-13T09:41:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>
Building systems used to be fully compatible and interoperable. Prior to digital 
controls, the best systems were built with pneumatic controllers. Electric 
signals are complicated. There’s voltage. There’s there is binary packing of 
data. There’s non-standardized xml vocabularies. Pneumatics were simple. 
Pressure was everything.</p>
<p>
Many institutional owners of buildings resisted the new-fangled digital controls...</p>]]></summary></entry></feed>