<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 27 May 2012 10:06:39 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>The New Daedalus</title><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Using COBIE as an integration interface</title><category>BIM</category><category>Integration</category><category>Intelligent Buildings</category><category>Schedules</category><category>Standards</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/4/29/using-cobie-as-an-integration-interface.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:16056253</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>At the meeting of the NIBS FMOC in Baltimore this spring, challenges in expanding the use of COBIE were again at center stage. The National Institute of Building Science (NIBS) is a public-private partnership to advance the identification and resolution of problems and potential problems that hamper the construction of safe, affordable structures. In recent years, one NIBS committee has led efforts to develop a national building information models standard (NBIMS). NBIMS is more than technology, and concerns far more than a 3D building model; BIM it is the basis for re-engineering the processes used in facility design and construction.</p>
<p>The Facilities Maintenance and Operations Committee (FMOC) of NIBS promulgates best practices in building operations. BIM has traditionally focused on initial building cost. Initial cost, though, is only 15 to 20%...</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-16056253.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Big Data, Buildings, and the Internet of Things</title><category>Data Center</category><category>Internet of Things</category><category>Markets and Innovation</category><category>Open Source</category><category>Privacy</category><category>System Architecture</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/3/30/big-data-buildings-and-the-internet-of-things.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:15661280</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Big Data is the hot new buzz-phrase for something that buildings system integrators have long struggled with. Last Thursday (3/29), the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) launched its public initiative on big data for government, the Big Data Research and Development Initiative.</p>
<p>The purpose of big data is to support analytics, that is the massive...</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-15661280.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Easy integration of the Internet with Things: Calendar Subscription and Syndication</title><category>Energy</category><category>Schedules</category><category>Smart Energy</category><category>Standards</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/3/11/easy-integration-of-the-internet-with-things-calendar-subscr.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:15390577</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I use Outlook in my day to day life. It shows me an aggregate calendar, with 
meetings I accept at UNC (one account) meetings I accept not at UNC (anther email account) and two corporate calendars: one based in Exchange, and one in SharePoint. When I was working on the national smart grid roadmap, my Outlook showed the calendar of that SharePoint project as well. In Outlook, I can turn each calendar off or on, and when aggregated, each appointment was a different color by source. I live by Calendar aggregation.</p>
<p>In my Phone, which happens to be an Android, I used to have...</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-15390577.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Scheduling Resources and Operations with BIM</title><category>Schedules</category><category>Smart Energy</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:58:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/2/3/scheduling-resources-and-operations-with-bim.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:14864781</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I wrote of standards for calendar synchronization, vcards, and directory services. This week, in a meeting on iResource, we explored the Enterprise IT perspective on the same issues. Today, I will place these two views side by side, and look for a solution.</p>
<p>In enterprise calendaring, conference rooms were originally added to corporate address books as if they were another person. An account was created in the corporate directory for each conference room, albeit an account that lacked an employee ID. This account was assocated with a calendar server and perhaps an email account. Conference rooms were set up Justas were senior staff that do not manage their own schedule. Anyone could invite the conference room to a meeting. An assigned administrative assistant received all schedule requests.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-14864781.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Path to Smart Energy</title><category>Energy</category><category>Microgrids and Distributed Systems</category><category>Smart Energy</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:36:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/1/22/the-path-to-smart-energy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:14690371</guid><description><![CDATA[<i>For the last two years I have been so immersed in smart energy that I sometimes lose track of the big picture myself. This post goes back to basics.</i>
<p>The power industry of North America has provided its customers with the greatest life style that any civilization has ever had. The old service model assumes an ever-present supply of power that is predictable, abundant, and inexpensive. World-wide, our plans are to reduce the power supplied by predictable an inexpensive power sources, to replace them with power sources that are intermittent and less predictable, and that are widely distributed across the grid, including within homes, businesses, and neighborhoods. The old service model will not survive...</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-14690371.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Podcasting Open Source Smart Energy</title><category>Sparseness</category><category>Standards</category><category>WS-Calendar</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2012/1/9/podcasting-open-source-smart-energy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:14505199</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The week before Christmas, I was interviewed by Phil Windley of <a href="http://www.itconversations.org/">itconversations.org</a>. The conversation started out about schedules for the internet of things, but was published under the title <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail5146.html">Open Source Smart Energy</a>. I was coming off a cold, and sounded like a frog croaking, but I enjoyed it, especially because the interview also let me meet Udell, whose work I have long admired. The conversation covered many of the high points of smart energy, including enterprise interaction, demand response, microgrids, and transactive energy.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-14505199.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Sharing Agendas with Buildings and Other Things</title><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:54:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2011/11/28/sharing-agendas-with-buildings-and-other-things.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:13889347</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Schedules for things have always been different from schedules for people. With things, schedules are step-by-step. Turn this switch on at 2:47. Start cooling at 3:00. We schedule people by results. Be at this meeting at 9:00. Complete the annual reviews by December 20. We expect people to schedule time to get dressed, walk the dog, drive to work, get some coffee, and be in the conference room at 9:00. In IT, we call this a Service orientation, as we request the service (be there on time) rather than the process.</p>
<p>The schedules of our lives have a service orientation...</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-13889347.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Planning for Abundance</title><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:48:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2011/11/1/planning-for-abundance.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:13559079</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>So what if things did change? What if distribution and electricity were not the be-all of commercial and domestic energy?</p>
<p>Some colleagues and I were discussing the improbable demonstration in Bologna on October 28, the <a href="http://www.e-catworld.com/">demonstration of Andrea Rossi&rsquo;s e-cat system</a>. As I write this, responses range from exuberance to cries of fraud and, guardedly, some comments that he might have pulled it off. E-Cat, which is protected today by trade secrets rather than by patents, claims to create a reaction between Hydrogen and Nickel to create Copper&hellip;and a self-sustaining amount of energy. Dr. Rossi aimed to demonstrate a 1 MW generator; he demonstrated something less than half of that; and reasonable skepticism runs high.</p>
<p>However that plays out, the question is one I have pondered before. The E-Cat system creates heat. That heat is used in the usual ways to create electricity. If you had an unending heat source behind the house, then it is unlikely you would use it all for electricity.</p>
<p>I have a friend in the center of San Diego who is going off the grid using a fuel cell. It may not make economic sense, but he dislikes his local power company. He wants to be self-reliant. He plans to run his meter backwards because he can. He is using conventional off-the-shelf technologies. What he is pondering most, though, is the heat.</p>
<p>His conventional fuel cell generates heat from combustion, and spins a little turbine. He then must she the heat, and run again. On campuses and industrial sites, we take advantage of this heat for cogeneration. He wants to do the same.</p>
<p>Being in San Diego, he first began considering shedding heat into his Jacuzzi. His plans then moved to thermal exchanges with his domestic hot water system, and with the heat exchangers in his HVAC. He lives, though, in a temperate area, and uses most of his energy for cooling. For these, he uses conventional heat pumps, which use plenty of electricity.</p>
<p>His fuel cell, though, generates heat first, and electricity second. Absorption Chillers might make much more sense for him, but today, there are few sources for no-maintenance absorption chillers for the home. Some use them to cool as a use for solar thermal, but that market is aimed more at the energy hobbyist than at the high-end set and forget consumer.</p>
<p>For years, I have though that every data center is a thermal energy source. But last Friday, as something that appears to be the descendent of cold fusion was publicly demonstrated, albeit with close control over how well the public could observe, I thought about abundance, and how we might re-arrange our homes, or offices, and our cities around cogeneration everywhere, and around harvesting what we call waste heat today.</p>
<p>Today, the heat that makes our electricity is far way. For each of us, we start with electricity, and layer thermal energy on top. But what would we do, what equipment would we make, if we could each of us, in each building, start with thermal energy, and layer electricity on top.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-13559079.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Schedule &amp; Commissioning and the Future of LEED</title><category>BIM</category><category>Schedules</category><category>Standards</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 02:07:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2011/8/7/schedule-commissioning-and-the-future-of-leed.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:12428091</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>NREL has recently released a report recommending tagging standards for building systems. This tagging standard is part of a larger recommendation on proper commissioning standards. The same report (<a href="http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50073.pdf">http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50073.pdf</a>) posits that a properly commissioned building system interface be able to offer up a light-weight building model, linked to these standard tags. This creates standard semantics for the building system as a minimum commissioning requirement for a future version of LEED.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-12428091.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Operational BIM Schedules and Pre-Design Programming</title><category>Construction</category><category>Microgrids and Distributed Systems</category><category>Schedules</category><category>Smart Grid</category><category>WS-Calendar</category><dc:creator>Toby Considine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/2011/7/25/operational-bim-schedules-and-pre-design-programming.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">139421:1263465:12263662</guid><description><![CDATA[Facility Programming is an important early step in step in the Integrated Design Process. Programming is defined in the Whole Building Design Guidelines (WBDG) as “the research and decision-making process that identifies the scope of work to be designed.” Programming is the first part of the design cycle, during which systems and space requirements are identified by the activities they will support. If the design process is compliant with the formal BIM process (BuildingSmart, NBIMS, etc.), then these systems and spaces are identified as described in the IFCs.

BIM is a collection of information sets and models with identified interfaces / information exchanges between them. A model that is of growing interest is the building’s energy model, which is today derived from...]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdaedalus.com/articles/rss-comments-entry-12263662.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
